|Get Involved Today! Make
a Donation! Get
Paul Gallegos, Humboldt County District Attorney (6 mins)
Kaitlin-Sopoci-Belknap, Campaign Co-Manager for Measure T (19 mins)
John Bonifaz, Attorney and Founder of the National Voting Rights Institute (17 mins)
Measure T Backers Target Corporate Power
EUREKA – The coalition supporting Measure T doesn’t believe corporations should have the same rights that individuals do, nor does District Attorney Paul Gallegos, and he and other speakers described the initiative as a means of short-circuiting unfair election laws during a forum last week.
Measure T has provoked instant and aggressive opposition. It seeks to ban political spending by non-local corporations, but also asks voters to make the “legislative findings” that the Supreme Court has asked for as a condition of hearing arguments against corporate electioneering.
The measure’s goals and motivations were explained on April 25 to an audience of about 35 people at Eureka’s Labor Temple, during which Gallegos spoke at length and with passion on his strong support for the ballot measure. He has personal experience with corporate-funded elections, as the 2003 attempt to recall him was almost single-handedly financed by the Pacific Lumber Company and its owner, the Houston-based Maxxam Corporation.
A 1999 ballot measure campaign by the Wal-Mart Corporation, which similarly failed in its attempt to get voters to approve a Eureka zoning change accommodating the construction of a super-store, rounds out the county’s history of corporate political funding. And Gallegos said the laws that allow it are based on flawed understanding of the Constitution, as are the intensely-couched criticisms of Measure T.
“What a lot of people don’t understand is that our constitution is a limitation on governmental power,” Gallegos told the mostly pro-Measure T audience. And he proceeded to describe how that concept has been reversed with the advent of election laws that deem corporate contributions to be free speech and corporations themselves as entities with the same rights as individuals.
DA: Rights are innate, not corporate
The DA added that empowering corporations undermines the foundation of constitutional beliefs – and the election process. “We need to correct this wrong to our rights and let our government know that we are people and people have rights, that’s where it begins and ends.”
But Measure T has been portrayed as a left wing delusion by its critics. Responding to that, Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap, Measure T’s campaign coordinator, pointed out that the history of court action shaping election laws is full of nearly split decisions and minority opinions that raise intense concerns about the effects of corporate political power.
Sopoci-Belknap emphasized that Measure T is not a symbolic gesture but a legal structure that’s been outlined by the Supreme Court. “The courts have said that communities do have the right to preserve the integrity of the electoral process,” she said. “So when you all vote yes on Measure T... we will be passing a law that has never been tried before, and we will be doing this for the exact reasons that the courts have said a community could pass such a law.”
‘You’re going to win’
But the county’s most controversial public figure, Rob Arkley, Jr., has said no to Measure T, informing county officials of his strong opposition and indicating that the initiative will be met with a legal challenge if it passes. Arkley owns the multibillion dollar Security National Servicing Corporation, which is proposing a shopping center project on Eureka’s bayfront – on the same site that Wal-Mart eyed in 1999 – and his company representative has said that a ballot measure campaign in support of the project is a possibility.
It won’t be if Measure T passes and stands, though. And during a question and answer session, Bonifaz drew loud and long applause when he said the level of opposition to Measure T gauges its importance, and added, referring to a quote from Gandhi, “They’re no longer ignoring you and they’re no longer laughing at you – they’re fighting you now, but I think you’re going to win.”
Humboldt County Leaders Endorse Measure T!
Democratic Party of Humboldt County
Green Party of Humboldt County
Central Labor Council of Humboldt and Del Norte Counties
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local #1684
Building and Construction Trades of Humboldt and Del Norte Counties
Carpenters Union Local #751
Operating Engineers Union Local #3 AFL-CIO
Paul Gallegos, Humboldt County District Attorney
Peter LaVallee, Eureka Mayor
Chris Kerrigan, Eureka City Council
Dave Meserve, Arcata City Council
Harmony Groves, Arcata City Council
Paul Pitino, Arcata City Council
Bob Ornelas, Former Arcata Mayor
Connie Stewart, Former Arcata Mayor
Elizabeth Conner, Former Arcata City Council
Julie Fulkerson, Former Humboldt County Board of Supervisors
... and hundreds of other individuals and local businesses! Join us today!
Learn more about Measure T in a Pros and Cons Video, produced by Eileen McGee (51 mins)
Humboldt Coalition for Community Rights